LIST 29 - 1828 CENSUS - THE MISSING - DEUXIEME DIZAINE - NEW SOUTH WALES

 
 
No  one  can doubt the importance and significance  of  the  1828 Census as perhaps 
'the' source document when considering  matters to do with the history and 
genealogy of the early colony. As  the first  census  of  the  infant  settlement  
it  has  always  been popularly supposed to include all known inhabitants. 
 
However during the course of the research into this book, it  has become  apparent 
that there were many people who  were  certainly alive  in  November 1828 but 
who did not appear  in  the  census. Given the importance of the 1828 Census, 
it was thought it  might be a good idea to list those who were missing from it.
 
This then is a "non list" in the sense that it is a listing about people  who  
are not listed. 
 
The  1828 Census includes just over one quartre of the  "Deuxieme Dizaine" (1,441 
names), where are all the rest? It is known  that 455  "Deuxieme Dizaine" members 
died before November 1828. It  is also  known  that 76 "Deuxieme Dizaine" members 
left  the  colony before  November 1828. A further 742 "Deuxieme  Dizaine"  members 
have no known documentation other than their birth or arrival  in the colony 
and these are presumed not to have survived childhood. The  Census only concerned 
itself with New South Wales and it  is known that 351 "Deuxieme Dizaine" members 
had either relocated to Van Diemens Land from Norfolk Island or were born there 
(many  of whom can be found in the Van Diemens Land musters of 1818, 1819 & 1822)  
so  these would not be expected to appear  in  the  census either. 
 
                 Table 29.1. - Pre 1828 Separations
 
                    Event                    No.
                    ----------------------------
                    death                    455
                    departure                 76
                    no documentation         742
                    Van Diemens Land         351
 
That  leaves  around  370 "Deuxieme Dizaine"  members  who  might reasonably  
have been expected to be included in the  census  but were not. As it turns out 
there are 285 members of the  "Deuxieme Dizaine"  whom  one might have thought 
ought to be  in  the  1828 Census  and  were  not. The remaining 84 either  died,  
left  the colony  or  moved  to Van Diemens Land  without  the  fact  being recorded 
(or not yet located).
 
To be included in this "missing" list, a person had to have  good evidence of 
actually being alive in November 1828 and not in  Van Diemens Land. One obvious 
circumstance was a date of death  later than the census. There are 66 "Deuxieme 
Dizaine" members who are known  to have a death date after November 1828. Then  
there  are those  who are known to have a colonial marriage after  1828  and 
still  others who are known to have the birth of a child  in  the colony  after  
1828. There were 136 of the former and 79  of  the latter  identified. Three 
men are known to have  started  defacto relationships  in  1829 and Jean Huon 
is known to have  left  the colony in 1832.
 
                 Table 29.2. - Post 1828 Evidence
 
                    Event                    No.
                    ----------------------------
                    death                     66
                    marriage                 136
                    child birth               79
 
The question that then comes to mind is why were all these people not included 
in the census? 
 
One  obvious  answer is that they were out of the colony  at  the time  of  the 
census. John Lord is a case in point, he  left  the colony  in  1816  for  England 
and did  not  return  until  1829. Likewise  Elizabeth  Forster  (Blaxland) did 
not  return  to  the colony  until  1829.  For others either their  departure  
is  not recorded  or  not located as yet. Sarah  Scarvell  (Redmond)  was known 
to be at sea in November 1828.
 
In 1828 Sarah Bate was at Moreton Bay with her husband Lt  Thomas Baimbridge.
 
It would make an interesting study in itself to see if there were any  common  
characteristics among the  recalcitrant,  were  they predominately Irish and 
Catholic for instance?
 
In  any  case 285 "Deuxieme Dizaine" members (155 males  and  130females)  are 
"missing" from the census or to put it another  way 20%  or a fifth more than 
those who are listed. Notice that  this is  an  improvement  on  the quarter  
"missing"  for  the  "First Generation", being older they obviously had greater 
opportunities to absent themselves.
 
The  information presented for each listing is:
 
               family name
               Christian name
               year of birth  
               parents' names  
               parents' civil status at the time of the child's birth
               parents' marital status at the time of the child's birth 
               age at the time of the census
               post  1828  documentation.  
 
Females have the added fields of:
 
               marital status
               spouse name
               name as it should appear in the census.
 
Since  they were not listed in the census obviously  the  details of; religion, 
occupation,  place of residence, number of acres of land owned and name as it 
appears in the original document cannot be included. For the females the name 
of their spouse and current  marital  status   has  been researched  from  other  
sources  and because  of their marriages, their name as it 'should' appear  in 
the census has been listed, although as is known from the  census itself,  what  
should appear and what actually  appears  are  not necessarily the same thing!
 
The  list  is  in alphabetical order;  sorted  firstly  upon  the father's  surname 
and secondly upon the child's  Christian  name. 
The females have been separated from the males, mainly because of the greater 
amount of details presented for the females.
 
The  year of birth and parental details come as always  from  the Pioneer Register 
Project.
 
The "age" of each entry was calculated by subtracting the year of birth  from  
1828. Unfortunately the years of  birth  of;  George Board,  Frederick  Butler, 
Eleanor Flood,  George  Peacock,  John Robinson & Robert Weatherall are unknown. 
 
The  "post 1828 documentation" is the evidence that supports  the fact  that  
the person was alive in 1828. 
 
The  "marital  status" of the females is an  assumption  in  some instances. 
Where the woman is married it has been assumed she  is still living with her 
husband and not separated, no instances  of widows has been found. 
 
There were 37 presumed single women, the remainder being  married and using their 
husbands's surname.


Proceed to Census Lists

Return to 1801-1810

Return to Home Page

This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be made to the publisher.