LIST 27 - 1822 MUSTER - DEUXIEME DIZAINE - NEW SOUTH WALES

 
 
The  final  muster  presented for New South  Wales  is  the  1822 Muster,  which  
took place in September of that year.  There  are 1,422 members  of the "Deuxieme 
Dizaine"  identified  from  this muster;  754 males and 668 females, 1,315 
colonial born  and  107 childhood arrivals. 
 
The information presented for each entry includes:
 
               family name
               Christian name
               year of birth  
               parents' names  
               parents' civil status at the time of the child's birth
               parents' marital status at the time of the child's birth 
               colonial born or childhood arrival
               age
               occupation/remarks
               place of residence
               surname as it appears in the original muster 
               reference number linking back to the original source document.
 
The  list  is  ordered; firstly alphabetically  on  the  father's surname then 
chronologically on the child's date of birth.
 
The 1822 Muster itself is in alphabetical order - sort of -  with children  listed  
under a parent in birth order -  sort  of.  The children of one family are bracketed 
together but their parent is not necessarily the entry directly above their 
grouping which can make identifying their true parents difficult at times. 
 
In some cases, a minority of cases regrettably, both the name and the  age  of 
the child is recorded. In other cases  the  name  is recorded but not the age. 
In rather too many other cases, the age of  the  child  is recorded but not the 
name,  then  again  other family groups record no names and only the age of the 
oldest  and youngest  child. Depressingly for the historian, in  still  other 
cases neither the name nor the age is recorded. Occasionally  the remarks column 
will specify 'son of' or 'daughter of', but mostly it is the unhelpful 'child 
of'. 
 
The  women  have been separated from the men  in  order  to  make sense of the 
surnames under which their entries are found in  the Muster  because many of 
them were already in  relationships  with men and following the English custom, 
women took their  husband's surname upon marriage. 
 
The year of birth and parental details are additional information researched  
for this work and not found in the  original  Muster. Once again the assistance 
of information contained in the Pioneer Register project was invaluable in 
collecting these details.
 
There  were  39 duplicate male entries and  30  duplicate  female entries  reducing  
the total to 1,353 individual members  of  the "Deuxieme  Dizaine"  (715  males 
and 638  females).  Ann  Elliott managed  to  be listed three times. Most  of  
these  duplications occurred  where  a  young person was employed  as  a  servant  
or apprentice and was recorded at their place of work as well as  at their parents 
homes.
 
The  family name for each entry must be handled with care.  Often the  children  
of the marriage are listed under the name  of  the mother (and her maiden name) 
rather than their father's  surname. For  example why were two of the children 
of William Baldwin  and Elizabeth  Carpenter placed under their father's surname 
and  the remaining eight under their mother's ?
 
Thomas  Petrie is listed under his stepfathers surname  of  Ward, William  Duggan 
under his stepfathers surname of  Tarlington  and Martha Capon under Rayner. 
In several cases, just to make  things even more complicated, the children are 
listed under the  surname of their stepmother ! An example would be the 4 children 
of Peter McAlpin,  whose  mother was Elizabeth Elton but they  are  listed under 
their stepmother Elizabeth Blake.
 
The  case  of Ann Upton is somewhat interesting,  she  is  listed under "Burns" 
with P and Jane Burns. Jane was her younger married sister,  with whom she was 
no doubt residing at the time  of  the muster,  and was mistakenly recorded under  
her  brother-in-law's surname.
 
Following  the usual English practice, once a woman  married  she used  her 
husband's surname and this is certainly the  case  with those  listed  in this 
Muster with only  fourteen  married  women still using their maiden names. 
 
Eleanor Clarke, even though married to Edward Leonard at the time of the Muster 
is listed under her first married name of Tierney ! Hannah  Fitzgerald's husband 
was recorded as being at  Newcastle, probably  with  a  colonial  sentence,  and  
it  is  unclear   if Fitzgerald  is  her  married  or maiden  name.  
 
The 1822 Muster has a couple of idiosyncrasies in the spelling of Christian names; 
Catherine habitually has the "e" dropped to give Cathrine and Margaret has the 
"a" dropped to give Margret. On the other hand Louisa gains an "e" as in Louiesa.
 
There  were 127 members of the "Deuxieme Dizaine" in  the  muster whose  parents 
could not be identified. They can all be found  in List 13 "Births from Musters 
and Censae".
               
As has so often been the case in this work, the Pioneer  Register project has 
provided many of the missing names where they are not specified  in  the  Muster. 
These entries are  identified  by  an asterix  (*)  and there are 240 of them 
on the list.  The  reader should  be  aware that in some cases a couple had  more  
children eligible for inclusion in the muster than spaces listed, in these cases 
generally the youngest children were selected.
 
The 'status' of the entries are either BC - colonial born or CF - came free. 
1,261 were colonial born, 121 came free. In passing it might  be  noted that 
the original muster lists the name  of  the ship  of arrival for the 'came free' 
but not the year, which  can lead to problems with ships which called at the 
colony more  than once.
 
Thomas  Cowper is shown as arriving on the 'Anne' instead of  the 'Indispensible'.  
Henry  Hancy's ship is  mistakenly  written  as 'Minerva'  instead of 'Minorca'. 
William Cox records  his  second arrival   on   the  'Windham'  instead  of  his  
first   on   the 'Experiment'. Likewise Matthew Gibbons records his second arrival 
on  the  'Saracen' rather than the first on the  'Minorca'.  Mary Longford is 
shown with her second arrival in the colony on  board the  'Mariner'  rather  
than  her  first  arrival  on  board  the 'Minorca'.  John Pearce is listed as 
arriving in 1801  and  Henry Fowler in 1804 but both regrettably with no ship 
specified. 
 
Thomas  Anderson, Isabella Birt(Byrne), John Hall, Thomas  Hancy, Thomas 
O'Donnell, Clara Pearce(Palmer), Frances & Sarah Phillips, Charlotte 
Shaunghessy(Earle), William Shelley are all recorded as colonial  born  when  
they  arrived  free  (admittedly  as  young babies). Ann Simpson(Thornley) is 
mistakenly recorded as colonial born when in fact she arrived as a convict.
 
Joseph  Smith's  parents  have not been identified,  but  as  his mother arrived 
as a convict on board 'Canada' in 1810, if he  was 15 years old it is hard to 
see how he could be colonial born.
 
The  following had no ship recorded; John Hillas, Mary  Jonquill, Margaret 
McCarthy, Catherine Wilson.
 
William Cowper is incorrectly listed as CF on the 'Indispensible' when  in  fact 
he was colonial born. 
 
James  &  William  Blackman and George Dale  all  are  mistakenly recorded as 
convicts.
 
A  little over half (745) the entries have their age recorded  in the  Muster. 
With regard to the age recorded in the 'age'  column it  will be noticed in some 
cases it does not correspond  to  the year  of birth. In these cases this may 
be an error in  recording on  the part of the muster clerks or their parents 
may  not  have been numerate or it may be that the wrong child has been selected 
from  the Pioneer Register records. Theoretically in this  muster the  ages  of 
the colonial born "Deuxieme Dizaine"  should  range from  12 to 22 but 19 are 
listed with ages less than  10  (George Moore is recorded as being 2) and Mary 
Griffiths, William Merrick and Rosetta Pearson have ages greater than 22.
 
The  possibilities for 'places of residence' would appear  to  be much  restricted  
when compared to for example the  1828  Census, only eleven place names have 
been used. 
 
               Table 27.1. - Place of Residence
 
                    Place               No.
                    -----------------------
                    Appin                26
                    Argyle                9
                    Bathurst             10
                    Evan                  1
                    Liverpool           159
                    Newcastle            10
                    Parramatta          228
                    Port Macquarie        2
                    Rooty Hill            3
                    Sydney              530
                    Windsor             434
 
Windsor,  Sydney,  Parramatta & Liverpool account for  over  96%.These 
descriptions should perhaps be taken as regions rather than referring to a 
specific town.
 
Thirteen people did not record their place of residence.
 
In  1822  there existed in the settlement two further  places  of secondary penal 
punishment for offences committed in the  colony; Newcastle and Port Macquarie. 
Sadly the two Peck brothers, Joshua and Thomas obviously got into trouble with 
their father and found themselves  with colonial sentences in Newcastle, as  did  
Thomas Crahan  and  Joseph  Cunningham. Likewise  Benjamin  Risby  found himself 
with a colonial life sentence at Port Macquarie.
 
Even  sadder  to report is that four females were  in  government employment  
at  Newcastle with colonial sentences;  Ann  Kennedy, Anne Poore, Mary Smith 
and Mary Stevens.
 
Mary Griffiths was record as a convict but there is a possibility it  may  be 
a clerical error especially since she  is  listed  as assigned  to Sir John 
Jamieson whom she later married. 
 
In  terms  of new information about the "Deuxieme  Dizaine",  the 
'occupation/remarks'  column is the most interesting,  especially since  by 1822 
the oldest of them would have been 22  years  old, giving one a glimpse into 
the nature of their adult lives. On the other  hand  the youngest were only 12 
years old, so  it  is  not surprising that only 234 (32%) have their occupation 
recorded and 59  (25%) of these are apprentices. One would like to think  that 
the  remainder were schoolboys but given the lack of  educational facilities 
in the colony at the time, sadly this is probably  not the case. The range of 
occupations were as follows:
 
              Table 27.2. - Male Occupations
 
              Occupation             No.
              --------------------------
              apprentice              59
              blacksmith               2
              boatbuilder              1
              botanist                 1
              cabinet maker            1
              clerk                    4
              constable                3
              cooper                   1
              employed by             27
              farmer                   1
              harness maker            1
              hatter                   1
              housekeeper              1
              labourer                26
              landholder              72
              merchant                 1
              nailer                   1
              overseer                 1
              pasturer                 1
              publican                 1
              servant                 16
              settler                  2     
              shingle splitter         1
              shoemaker                2
              stonemason               1
              storekeeper              1          
              tanner & currier         1
              wheelwright              5
 
William  Merrick was a constable as well as a  landholder  whilst Archibald  and  
William Bell were both Justices of the  Peace  as well as landholders.
 
It will be noted that 76 of the "Deuxieme Dizaine" were in  rural pursuits; 
landholders, farmers, settlers, pasturer. No doubt many of  those  who did not 
record their occupations would  have  been similarly  engaged.  The  extent of 
land  ownership  amongst  the "Deuxieme  Dizaine" , which shall be discussed 
more fully  below, should be noted.
 
It  is  pleasing  to see how many  boys  were  in  apprentiships, leading to 
future employment as tradesmen, even if as noted above this led to many duplicate 
entries.
 
Twenty seven boys were recorded as being "employed by" someone or other  but 
one is none the wiser as to what that  employment  may have involved.
 
Some  of those with more noteworthy occupations  include  Charles Gordon who 
was a botanist and Thomas Underwood who at a young age was already a merchant. 
Henry Elph is recorded as an  housekeeper which is unusual because this was 
usually a female occupation.
 
Interesting  'remarks' include David Broadarrow as being  adopted by  William  
Davis  and  Thomas Johnson who  was  in  the  asylum unfortunately.
 
The miserable reprobates who had colonial sentences have  already been noted 
above. To which can be added Thomas Douglas who was in goal awaiting trial.
 
In this time and era, virtually the only occupation available for a  woman was 
that of wife and mother, and already by the time  of the  1822  Muster 210 of 
the women on the list were  married  and another  widowed - Elizabeth Bain(Tyne).
 
Mary Nowland is mysteriously listed as the wife of J Mein.
 
Four   women;   Margaret  Donnelly,  Charlotte   Gulledge,   Mary Harmsworth  
and Sophia Priestly are recorded as "living  with"  a man  but it is not clear 
if this means in a defacto  relationship or just boarding there.
 
Once  a  woman  married she gave up work  outside  her  home  and family.  The  
only exceptions being; Mary Lee,  who  even  though married  to  William Ralph, 
was employed in some capacity  by  Mr Meehan  and Mary Jonquill, recorded twice, 
once under her  maiden name as a housekeeper and secondly under her married name 
as  the wife of Michael Dodd. Rosetta Pearson, who is also recorded twice in  
the muster, is listed both as the wife and servant of  Edward Devine !
 
Many  of the "Deuxieme Dizaine" girls were still too young to  be married but 
old enough to be employed in one capacity or another. The  occupations engaged 
in by the unmarried women and girls  are as listed in the table below:
 
              Table 27.3. - Female Occupations
 
              Occupation             No.
              --------------------------
              employed by             21
              hospital                 1
              householder              1
              housekeeper             11
              mantua maker             1
              servant                 56
 
Like  the  men  21 girls were recorded  as  being  "employed  by" someone  or  
other  but one is none the wiser  as  to  what  that employment may have involved.
 
Ann  Simpson  was a "householder" but whether this  is  different from a 
"housekeeper" is hard to say.
 
The  most  common occupation for the girls  before  marriage  was that  of  servant 
and as noted above this led to  many  duplicate entries.
 
Of interest is the case of Mary Ann, even though the daughter  of John Piper, 
one of the wealthiest men in the colony, at the  time was  working as a servant 
- the unhappy fate of bastard  children one supposes.
 
It is so sad to see so many of the children described as orphans, 22  boys  and 
11 girls, it is even sadder to think that  many  of them  remain  'orphans'  in 
the historical  sense  because  their parents  have not been identified at this 
time. In spite  of  all this,  one  can  only hope that they went on to  have  
happy,  if obscure,  lives. The female orphanage was in Parramatta  and  the 
clerks their tended to not even record the age of the girls.  The male orphanage 
was in Sydney and the clerks were more diligent in at   least   recording  ages.  
The  oldest  children   in   these institutions  were 14 so presumably after 
this age they were  let out to fend for themselves.
 
In a time and era when such things mattered seven of the "Deuxieme Dizaine"  women 
were given an honorific; Frances Bayly, Hannah  & Janet   Johnston,   Mary  &  
Sarah  Marsden   as   'Miss',   Mary Ikin(Longford),   Sarah   Cooley(Wood)   as   
'Mrs'.
 
The  1822  Muster has a second part called the  "Land  and  Stock Muster  of 
New South Wales 1822". As the name suggests, it  is  a record  of all the 
landholders in the colony, listing  the  total number  of  acres each person 
holds, how the  land  was  obtained (grant  or purchase), the number of acres 
under  cultivation  and what type of crops are grown (wheat, maze, barley, pease,  
beans, potatoes,  fruit) as well as the number of stock held  and  their types  
(horses,  cattle,  sheep, hogs). 
 
Men  appearing  in  this  second list  have  a  reference  number starting with 
"B" which has been added to their "remarks  column" details. Only the total number 
of acres held is recorded in  this list  but the reader is directed to the original 
entry  for  more complete  information about the agricultural activities of  their 
person of interest.
 
Of the 72 names in the first section of the muster who are listed as "landholders" 
only 43 are to be found in the second section as actually  owning  any acres, 
along with "farmer" Owen  Byrne  and "pasturer" Thomas Vandercom. The 
significance of this is hard  to fathom, perhaps they were sharing land with 
their fathers.  Given the  young  age of the "Deuxieme Dizaine" at this time  
it  is  a wonder that there were any landholders at all. 
 
The  largest landholders were James Arndell with 1,500 acres  and William  Cox  
with 1,300. The smallest were  Thomas  Petrie(Ward) with 6 and Robert Martin 
with just 5 acres.
 
The  reader  cannot  help but notice how many  of  the  "Deuxieme Dizaine"  were  
either landowners, tradesmen or on their  way  be becoming  tradesmen  with 
relatively few in the  lowly  ranks  as unskilled labourers. The colony truely 
was proving to be the land of opportunity !
 
Finally  the following table lists 19 married women whose  maiden names  at  this  
time have not been determined. In  the  case  of Captain Campbell, the maiden 
and Christian names of his wife  are not known, and not knowing the Christian 
name of Captain Campbell makes the task of identifying his marriage even harder.
 
                   Table 27.4 - Wives Surname Unknown
 
Name              Status  Spouse              Location    Name in Muster Ref. 
No.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mary              BC      John Bowen          Sydney      BOWEN          A01777
Mary              BC      W Brown             Windsor     BROWN          A02371
Charlotte         BC      Samuel Brownett     Sydney      BROWNETT       A02466
Mary              BC      James Butler        Windsor     BUTLER         A02935
Frances           CF      Peter Byrne         Windsor     BURNS          A02809
                  BC      Capt Campbell       Sydney      CAMPBELL Mrs   A03191
Elizabeth         BC      Benjamin Carver     Windsor     CARVER         A03480  
Mary              BC      William Clarke      Windsor     CLARKE         A03866    
Ann          1803 BC 19   J Clements          Windsor     CLEMENTS       A04005 
Sarah             BC      Thomas Darden       Paramatta   DARDEN         A05340
Martha            BC      Thomas Freeman      Sydney      FREEMAN        A07675  
Catherine         BC      John Hogan          Windsor     HOGAN          A10217     
Mary              BC      William Humphries   Sydney      HUMPHRIES      A10811  
Elizabeth   1804  BC 18   W Lewis             Windsor     LEWIS          A12861 
Jane        1807  BC 15   John Lindsey        Windsor     LINDSAY        A12952 
Hannah            BC      Matthew Mucklow     Parramatta  MUCKLOW        A15293 
Mary              BC      Richard Sommers     Sydney      SOMMERS        A19915 
Mary              BC      George Stone        Sydney      STONE          A20230 
Ann               BC      T Turner            Sydney      TURNER         A21368 
Elizabeth         BC      Thomas Woodward     Sydney      WOODWARD       A23259 
 


Proceed to Muster Lists

Return to 1801-1810

Return to Home Page

This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be made to the publisher.