LIST 14 - BAPTISMS - TROISIEME DIZAINE - ST MARYS HOBART

 
 
The second Roman Catholic parish to be established in the  colony was  St Marys 
at Hobart Van Diemens Land. This eleventh  'primary source'  list contains the 
details of 70 baptisms recorded in  St Mary's  church register for children born 
between 1811 and  1820, 35 males and 35 females.
 
The information recorded and presented for each child is  exactly as described 
for St Phillips in List 4.
 
These St Marys Hobart baptisms account for  1% of the  "Troisieme Dizaine".
 
There  were  nine duplicate entries on the  register  during  the period  under 
study reducing the total of individual baptisms  to 61 (30 males & 31 females). 
All nine were previously baptized  at Anglican  churches, thus bearing witness 
to the  early  sectarian divide in the colony (which existed well into the latter 
part  of the twentieth century).
 
Where the father's surname has a second name separated by a slash '/', the surname 
after the slash is how the name was spelt in the original document or if second 
name is substantially different it refers to an alias. Where the mother's surname 
has a second  name separated by a slash, the surname after the slash is her  
married name  at the time of the recording being made if she was  married more 
than once. 
 
The  reference  number would direct the reader  to  the  relevant entry in the 
original source document.
 
It  should  be noted that this list  contains  considerably  more information  
than will be found in the original church  register, being the result of decades 
of research,  principally  associated with  the  Pioneer Register Project.
 
Not infrequently genealogists are confronted with odd  situations in  the  
pursuit of their passion and the case  of  the  Reverend Conolly and his baptismal 
register is one such example.
 
The Rev. Philip Conolly along with the Rev. John Therry were  the first   
officially  sanctioned  Roman  Catholic  priests  to   be  appointed to the colony 
of New South Wales. They sailed  together in the 'Janus' reaching Sydney on the 
3rd May 1820. Whilst Therry was  allocated to New South Wales, Conolly was 
destined  for  Van Diemens  Land but Governor Macquarie detained him in  the  
senior colony for a year.
 
Four weeks after his arrival Conolly performed his first  baptism on the 31st 
May. He continued to baptise children until Macquarie finally released him to 
his duty in Hobart Town. He performed his last  baptism in Sydney on the 23rd 
March 1821. According to  his entry  in the 'Australian Dictionary of Biography', 
Conolly  left for  Hobart in April 1821 arriving on the 14th and upon  checking 
Cumpston's  'Shipping Arrivals & Departures,  Sydney,  1788-1825' the  only ship 
to leave for that southern settlement around  this time  was  the brig 'Active'. 
He performed his first  baptism  in Hobart two days later on the 16th April.
 
So far so good but it would appear that the Rev. Conolly took his register  with  
him to Hobart Town resulting  in  the  intriguing situation of having several 
people born and baptised in New South Wales appearing in records in Van Diemens 
Land!
 
Adding  to  the  genealogical  challenge,  Conolly  recorded  his baptismal entries 
in Latin, transcribing all the Christian  names into  that  ancient  language. 
Fortunately  most  can  be  easily retranslated  into English although the correct 
transcription  of "Lamentis" remains a mystery.
 
One  final  twist  in the saga, the State  Archives  in  Tasmania assigned  a  
consecutive running number to each entry  for  every birth  in  the colony. The 
twenty four baptisms  from  New  South Wales  (but  recorded as at Hobart) run 
from 893 to 1106  but  in assigning  the  numbers they obviously transposed the  
first  and second pages of Conolly's register. As a consequence numbers  893 
to  904  refer  to baptisms on the  second  page occurring  after baptisms on 
the first page, numbered 905 to 916.
 
Those  few entries which have a date of birth recorded come  from analysis 
conducted for the Pioneer Register Project, the dates of birth not being recorded 
in the original document.
 
Thirty  five baptisms took place after 1820 when  older  children came  to baptism, 
the latest being John McCarthy in 1826  at  the age of nine.
 
There was one baptism of a native child on the list.
 
On  this  occasion the numbers of  boys and  girls  were  exactly equal. Three 
fifths of fathers were convicts or former  convicts, and  two fifths of the 
mothers were convicts or former  convicts. Only  four mothers were colonial born 
and there were no  colonial born fathers. Sadly the civil status of 40% of parents 
is unknown at this time. Only a third of the births were legitimate.
 
                      Table 14.1 - Baptisms St Marys Hobart
                                                                    
               Total  Males  Females  Convict  Convict  Colonial  Colonial  Legitimate 
                                      Father   Mother   Father    Mother    
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     1820      24     12     12       17       10        0         1         6         
    >1820      46     23     23       25       16        0         3        15         
              ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Totals    70     35     35       42       26        0         4        21         
Percentages         50.0%  50.0%    60.0%    37.1%     0.0%      5.7%     30.0%       
 
Entries on this list have the reference identifier "SMH" on  List 1.  To  locate  
an entry on this list;  firstly  an  alphabetical search on the name would be 
made on List 1 from which the date of baptism would be retrieved, secondly using 
the appropriate  date, the  baptism  would  be  located on  this  list  and  finally  
an alphabetical  search on the name would be made on  the  baptismal date if 
there should be more than one entry for that date. 


Proceed to Church Registers

Return to 1811-1820

Return to Home Page

This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be made to the publisher.