LIST 4 - MARRIAGES - BRIDES NAME ORDER
There were 8,434 marriages recorded during this decade, which is over
five thousand more than in the previous decade.
The information recorded for each marriage is as follows:
date
church
bride
family name
Christian name
year and ship of arrival
civil status at time of marriage
age at marriage
groom
family name
Christian name
year and ship of arrival
civil status at time of marriage
age at marriage
The marriages are listed in alphabetical order on the name of the
bride.
A slash (/) after the family name indicates that the bride was widow
and her maiden name if known, preceeds the slash and her previous
married name succeeds the slash.
The ship of arrival (or date of birth) of only 4,879 brides (58%) has
been identified for this decade, with the arrival status of further
154 being known, bringing the percentage to 61%, the vast majority
being convicts or former convicts. This greatly increased
percentage of non identified brides is a reflection on the increasing
proportion of free persons arriving in the colony, who unlike their
convicted counterparts are far less well documented in colonial
records of the time.
Sometimes the marriage register records a ship of arrival but the name
cannot be located on the relevant shipping indent. These are
indicated by the absence of a year of arrival.
Sometimes the marriage register records the bride was native born but
no collaborting evidence of the birth can be located. These are
indicated by the absence of a year of birth.
With regard to the brides, of the 5,033 (61%) whose arrival status
has been found there were basically three groups; convicts (2,620 -
51%), colonial born (1,090 - 21%) and free arrivals (1,322 - 25%).
The convict group can be further divided into: serving convicts;
2,468 (48%) and emancipated or pardoned convicts; 152 (3%).
Amongst the colonial born there was one Aborigial and two Maoris.
Of the free arrivals group; 422 (8%) were not further classified, 159
(3%) were chidren accompanying adults and 741 (14%) were bounty
immigrants who were introduced to the colony in great numbers during
this decade.
Of those whose arrival status is unknown very few would be serving
convicts as they are relatively easily identifiable meaning the
proportions of all other categories would almost certainly double.
There were 87 brides who are described in the marriage register as
a "free woman". Unfortunately it is not certain whether this means
free by arrival, servitude or birth. But in all probability most of
these would be free by servitude.
There were 91 duplicate entries, these are marked with an asterix (*).
The majority (80) were couples being remarried in the Catholic
Church after a Protestant ceremony (50 to Anglicans, 11 to
Presbyterians, 2 to Wesleyan-Methodists and 2 to Hebrews). 15 refer
to first marriages before 1831. There were surprisingly five cases
of a Presbyterian marriage following an Anglican one and one case
of an Hebrew marriage after an Anglican one.
More difficult to explain and understand are the three couples who
had two Anglican marriages (John Cook to Fanny Hamilton in 1840,
Henry Stockford to Elizabeth Bowen in 1838 and John Supple to Mary
Foster in 1839/40) and the two couples who had two Presbyterian
marriages (Thomas Johnson to Elizabeth Gill in 1836 and Thomas Foster
to Mary Ann Robinson in 1838/40).
Whilst some parish registers began to record the age of the bride and
groom, in most instances this is a computed figure from ages recorded
on shipping indents, death details, census & muster details.
Therefore they must be treated as an estimate at best. Only for the
colonial born is it calculated from a known date of birth.
The age of 59% of the brides has been calculated, but as they say "the
past is a different country, they do things differently there".
No less than 12 colonial born brides were only 13 years old (with
known recorded birth dates) when they married and 23 were only 14.
At the other age extreme, Sarah Fox claimed to be 72!
Another issue which arises when attempting to identify brides is in
regard to the shipping indents. Married women are often recorded
under both their maiden and married names but unfortunately
the two names are only identified as an "alias" making it unclear
which is which. It would have been so much more helpful if they had
identified the maiden name with a "nee".
Proceed to Bride List
Return to 1831-1840
Return to Home Page
This work is copyright. Apart from any fair
dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as
permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process
without written permission. Enquiries should be made to the publisher.