INTRODUCTION

 
 
 
The  second decade (1801 to  1810) of British   Convict  Transportation  to   New 
South Wales resulted in a  further  1,313 female felons  being sentenced  to  
transportation  to  the  colony,  bringing  the    total transported  up to this 
point in time to 2,818.
 
This  second  decade  corresponds with the  governorships  of   Captain Phillip 
Gidley King RN and Captain William Bligh RN.  Cornishman, Capt. King  was aged 
42 years old when arrived aboard 'Speedy'  on the   15th April  1800  to  become  
the colony's  third  governor.   King  arrived  accompanied  by his wife Anna 
Josepha nee Coombe and  one son  and  two daughters.  Thus  Mrs King became the  
colony's  first  'First   Lady'.  [But there is an interesting  historical  mystery 
preceding  this,   in the  interregnum between  the  departure  of Governor Phillip  
and  the arrival  of  Governor Hunter, Major Grose, commander of the  New  South 
Wales Corps became head of  government with  his  wife  becoming 'First Lady'  
but  nowhere  in  colonial records  or  elsewhere  is  her  name recorded!]   He  
departed  the colony almost seven years later  on  the 10th February 1807  aboard 
'HMS  Buffalo'  a  sick  man  and  died   in  1808.   Hailing   from Devonshire  
Capt.  Bligh was aged 52  years  old  when  he  arrived aboard  'Lady  Sinclair'  
on the 5th August 1806   to  become   the  colony's fourth and final naval  governor.  
Bligh's  wife  Elizabeth  nee Betham did not accompany him but his daughter Mary,  
Mrs  John  Putland,   did who acted as his consort. He departed  the  colony 
almost  four years later  on the  12th May 1810 aboard  'HMS  Porpoise' after  
being  deposed  in the 1808 'Rum Rebellion' and died in  1817  a Vice-Admiral.
 
 
During  this  decade the women were transported in seventeen ships,  an average   
of less than two per annum, with none arriving in  1805  only one  in  1804,  
1807 and 1810 but three in 1801,  1806  and  1809.  The greatest number of  arrivals  
per year being 215 in 1801 and the least, with just 53, in 1802. 
 
               Table 1. - Female Convict Ships  
            
            Arrival Date  Ship                  Code
            ----------------------------------------
            21 Feb 1801    Anne                 01AN
            12 Jun 1801    Earl Cornwallis      01EC
            11 Dec 1801    Nile                 01NI
            26 Jun 1802    Hercules             02HE
             7 Jul 1802    Atlas I              02AT
            11 Mar 1803    HMS Glatton          03HG
            12 May 1803    Rolla                03RO
            26 Jun 1804    Experiment           04EX
            15 Feb 1806    Tellicherry          06TE
            11 Apr 1806    William Pitt         06WP
            20 Aug 1806    Alexander            06AL
            18 Jun 1807    Sydney Cove          07SC
            16 Nov 1808    Speke                08SP
            26 Jan 1809    Aeolus               09AE
            25 Jun 1809    Experiment           09E2
            18 Aug 1809    Indispensible        09IN
             8 Sep 1810    Canada               10CA
    
Of the total dispatched (1,313), 30 women died during the voyage and  1 was  
relanded  before  sailing, leaving just 1,282   arriving  in   the colony.   Charles 
Bateson is considered the authority when  considering the numbers of    convicts 
transported to Australia, however there  are discrepancies  with the actual ships 
indents held on microfiche at  the National  Library in Canberra; Bateson records 
95 for the  "Anne"  1801 but  the indent 94, Bateson 96 for the "Earl Cornwallis" 
1801  but  the indent  97, Bateson 96 for the "Nile" 1801 but the indent  97,  
Bateson 136  for the "Experiment" 1804 but the indent 138, Bateson 42  for  the 
"Alexander"  1806 but the indent 48, Bateson 113 for the "Sydney  Cove" 1807  
but  the indent 114. The end result being this  database  listing 1,282 names 
in total.
 
Eleven  of the seventeen ships carried both male and  female  convicts, however  
"Experiment"  1804  carried only two males  and  "Sydney  Cove "1807" only four. 
 
 
In this work the information on each convict transport is divided  into three  
sections:  first the ship's details, second the  convict  indent  and   third 
a colonial chronology presenting the  fate  of  each  women after landing.
 
 
Ship Details
This   section   details  the dates of sailing for,  arrival   at   and departure   
from   Sydney   Town as well as the   route   sailed,   the length of the voyage 
and the place and date of building the ship.  With regard  to the crew, the Ship's 
Master and Surgeon  Superintendent  are normally  always listed but apart from 
a few notable  exceptions  where the  names of the whole crew have been recorded, 
other individual  crew  member's   names  are usually only listed when they  have  
appeared  in colonial  documents for whatever reason. Finally any free voyagers  
are listed, including cabin passengers, other  free  arrivals  (often   the wives   
and  children  of  male convicts  already  in the  colony)  and finally   any  
children  who might  have  been  allowed  to   accompany  their  convict  mothers 
sentenced  to  transportation. 
 
The Route Sailed
Ports  of   call  along  the  way  included; Teneriffe,  Madeira,  Cape Verde, 
Rio  de  Janeiro, San Salvadore and The Cape. The "Sydney  Cove" 1807  was  the 
first transport to make a direct voyage to  Sydney  Cove with  no ports of call, 
most transports only had one with a few  making three.  The  longest voyage  (240   
days)  was  that of the "Anne"   in  1801 and  the shortest (154 days) was that 
of the "Experiment" in 1804. 
 
Eleven  ships sailed from English ports and six from Irish  ports.  All ships  
came  from the United Kingdom via the Cape of  Good  Hope,  none  via  Cape  Horn. 
 
Age and Size
The  oldest ship was the "Earl Cornwallis" built  in  1782, meaning  by the  time 
she arrived in 1801 she was nineteen years old,  However  the "Aeolus" built 
one year later in 1783 was twenty six years old when she arrived  in  1809. The 
newest ship was "William Pitt" built   in  1804, however  the "Hercules" being 
built in 1801 was only one year old  when she  arrived in 1802. The year of 
construction of the "Anne"  1801  has not been found. 
 
The   smallest  transport, at 146 tons, was the  "Experiment" 1809  and the largest, 
at 1,256 tons, was "HMS Glatton" 1803.  A rough estimation of  just  how crowded 
and cramped these poor women convicts   were   on  the transports can be made  
by  dividing  the tonnage  by the number of women (and men) on board. Using this  
calculation the  "Anne" 1801  was the   most   cramped  with  just  2.2  tons  
per   convict   and    the  "Indispensable"  1809  the  least cramped with more  
than  double  that number   at   5.7 tons  per woman. This of course does  not  
take  into  consideration the crew, free passengers and the convicts' children!
 
Free Arrivals
The  female convict transports appear to have been  favoured  for  free  people,   
women   in particular, wishing  to  travel  to   the  colony.  Almost  every 
ship seems to have carried some  wives  and  children  of male  convicts  already 
in the colony (some attempt has been   made  to identify the husbands). Nicholson 
records for  some but  by  no   means all transports, the  number  of  free  persons 
carried  and  the number of  children allowed to  accompany  their convict  mothers.  
Unlike  in later  decades  the  ships'  indents did not list  the  number  of  
any  children on board and those that are listed only  being discovered from 
other  colonial  records,  most frequently  from church  registers  for daughters  
who  subsequently married in the colony. In this  decade  57 children  have  been 
identified, with the "Canada" 1810  recording  the most at 10.
 
It  was not only wives who travelled to join their convict husbands  in the  colony,  
several  husbands also travelled to  join  their  convict wives, in this decade 
at least four did so.
 
 
The   sources  for  this section were: Charles  Bateson  "The   Convict Ships,   
1787-1868"   and   Ian  Nicholson   "Shipping   Arrivals   and Departures   Sydney,   
1788-1825".  The crew   and   free   passengers' details    derive    mainly    
from  the    Society    of    Australian Genealogists' "Free Passengers to NSW 
1788-1825".
 
 
Convict Indent
This  section presents information from the original ship's  indent  of  the  
convicts  onboard.  Details listed  during  this  decade  include: Surname  and  
any aliases, Christian Name, Date  Tried,   Where  Tried, Sentence  and  Remarks. 
Fields added in later decades  such  as  Indent  Number, Age on Arrival, Native 
Place, Trade or Calling and Offence were not included in any of this decade's 
indents.
 
All the Irish ships only recorded the month or season (Summer,  Spring, Lent 
etc) of the Date of Trial, in many cases not recording the date at all.  The  
"Anne" of 1801 recorded neither the Date nor  the  Place  of Trial,   perhaps  
the  least  informative  indent  in  the   whole   of transportation.
 
"HMS  Glatton"  was  one of only a couple of  Royal  Navy  ships  which transported 
convicts to the colony, and whilst its indent is bereft  of many  details,  like 
all ships in this decade, descendants  and  others have  done a great job in 
researching the missing information for  some of the women.
 
 
The  provenance of each indent is mixed. It would appear to  have  been a 
multi-staged process. Name and Conviction details seem  to have  been  collected  
and recorded by  the  British  authorities before  the  ship  sailed,  whereas 
all other details seem  to  have  been  collected   at  Sydney    Cove   by  colonial   
authorities    before    the   convicts  disembarked. For instance those relanded 
or  dieing  at sea  or   being too sick to remain onboard often only  have  their 
names and sentencing details recorded but no other information.
 
Indent Number
This   number  commences  at "one" and runs to the  total   number   of convicts   
embarked.   It  is of great assistance   in   locating   any particular  convict  
on  the indent because the  indents  are  ordered; alphabetically,   not   by   
name  but by  county  of   trial, although  Scottish   counties   always   followed   
the    English   ones,   then chronologically  by  date of sentencing. The Old 
Bailey  in  London  is listed under the letter "M"  for Middlesex.
 
In  this  decade  indent  numbers were not recorded  however  it was  a relatively  
simply matter to generate them de novo.  
 
Surname and any Aliases
In  this  decade there were no women whose surname  was  not  recorded. In  later 
decades these women tended to be women of  colour,  convicted outside of the 
United Kingdom.
 
Aliases  present a real problem for the married convicts,  because  the "alias"  
is obviously the maiden/married name of the woman but  it   is  never  entirely  
clear  which is the former  and   which   the  latter.  Sometimes  the  "remarks" 
column clarifies the  matter  by  naming  the husband but mostly this is not 
the case.  Additionally there  seems  to be no consistency in approach; on the 
one  indent sometimes  the  first surname listed is the maiden  name  and  at 
other times vice versa.
 
Christian Name
Christian names tended to be "Christian" in nature, and in this  decade there 
were not unusual exceptions apart from "Phiadelphia" perhaps.
 
Age on Arrival
For this second decade ages on arrival were not recorded. Where an  age appears  
it  was calculated from colonial records,  in  particular  the Census of 1828 
and parish marriage registers.
 
Recorded   ages   ranged  from  8  to  59  (from  the  limited   sample with  
calculated  ages). The vast majority  of  women  were   in  their twenties.  The  
youngest was Elizabeth Hurley  (per  "Earl  Cornwallis" 1801)  who  claimed to 
be 22 years old at the time of her  marriage  in 1815  making her only eight 
years old at her time of arrival, which  is most  unlikely.  Undoubtedly  the 
age of 22 is  not  correct,  she  was probably  at  least a decade older, after 
all her groom  was  aged  50! Sarah Sanders (per "HMS Glatton" 1803) claimed 
to be 10 if the age  she gave to the 1828 Census is to be believed. Hannah Bentley 
(per  "Speke" 1808)  claimed to be 11 if she really was aged 40 at the  1837  
Muster. The oldest was Mary Pullen aged 59 if her age at death was correct.
 
Religion 
Unlike in later decades, during this decade Religion was not  recorded. However 
the 1828 Census did record the religion (Protestant,  Catholic, Jewish)  of its 
entries, so if a women has an entry in the Census,  her religion most likely 
can be determined.
 
Marital Status 
Unlike  in  later decades, during this decade Marital  Status  was  not recorded 
but some obviously married women can be identified because the names  of their 
husbands were recorded. The vast majority  were  single thus  fulfilling the  
hopes of the British government to help  populate the new  colony  by marrying 
there and raising a family.
 
Native Place
During  this  decade  Native  Place was not  recorded,  in  those  rare instances  
where it is listed it has been supplied by  descendants  and other  interested 
researchers. In the absence of this  information  for most  of the ships an 
approximation has been made from place of  trial. Certainly  those women 
convicted in Ireland were overwhelmingly  Irish, and  those convicted in Scotland 
were certainly Scottish, the same  for the  Welsh convictions. When it comes 
to those convicted in England  it is a different matter, there were a lot of 
Irish convicted in  England. Taking data from the 1830's (a decade in which the 
information was much more complete) 15% were Irish and a smaller percentage Welsh. 
Thus  the nationality  breakdown for this decade can be roughly calculated  as  
- English 66%, Welsh 2%, Scottish 1%, Irish 31%.
 
Due  to  lack of information it cannot be said for this decade  if  any women  
did not come from one the four countries of the United  Kingdom.
 
Trade or Calling
During this decade the ship's indents did not record Trade or  Calling. However 
descendants and others have recorded this information for  some of  the women. 
Most were servants, but others like Mary Ann Martin  per "Canada"  1810 was a 
school teacher, Ann Taylor also per "Canada"  1810 described  herself as a 
housewife even though she was  supposedly  only thirteen years old and not 
married.
 
When Tried 
Most   female  felons were transported within a few months   of   being  convicted,  
they did not have to linger in goal for too  long. Even so
there  was  one  woman who had served eight years by the  time  of  her arrival;  
Jane Walsh per "Rolla" 1803 (but she had a Life  sentence  to serve), Hannah 
Maddocks per "William Pitt" 1806 had already served  six years of her seven year 
sentence by the time she arrived. 
 
As  noted above "Anne" 1801 did not record date of trial and  where  it does 
appear it comes from the woman's entry in the 1811 Muster.
 
Where Tried 
The   women   were   tried in all four  countries   of   the   Kingdom; England,   
Wales,   Scotland  and Ireland and  from   virtually   every county  of those 
countries as well as the Isle of Man. It has sometimes been  assumed  that most  
convicts were  the  refuse of  the  Kingdom's  major   metropolises  (London, 
Edinburgh,  Dublin) but in  this  decade only 37% being convicted in those three 
cities.
 
As  noted above "Anne" 1801 did not record place of trial and where  it does 
appear it comes from the woman's entry in the 1811 Muster.
 
Sentence
Sentencing  policies followed the established pattern of  seven  years, fourteen  
years or life. The  vast  majority  of  sentences  were   for  seven   years   
(82%) followed  by  life sentences (14%)  and  fourteen years (4%). Unusualy 
four women received five year sentences, all  were Scottish.  
 
It   must be said that there seemed to be very little   consistency  in  sentencing.   
Although   both  known  murderesses  were   given    life  sentences. The authorities 
seemed to  take  a particularly dim view  of counterfeiting  money  ("bad notes", 
"base coin", "coining") with  most offenders (but not all) receiving a life 
sentence for this crime.  Also "receiving    stolen  goods"   was   considered   
worse  than    actual  stealing  with  most receiving a life sentence.
 
Offence
During  this  decade  Offence was not recorded. Where  the  crime  does appear, 
it has been supplied by descendants and others. Mention must be made  however  
of those women  convicted at the Old Bailey  in  London. These trials have been 
transcribed and placed online, resulting in many descendants  and  other family 
researches being able to supply  a  full account of the trial, including a 
description of the offence.
 
The  vast  majority of the female felons were convicted  of  what today  would  
be considered "minor" theft. The biggest  categories  of  stolen items being 
money, food and clothing. However in this decade there were a  surprisingly large 
number of women convicted of forging  bank  notes and coins, a crime which was 
particularly harshly looked done upon  and all received either fourteen year 
or life sentences.
 
People  are often surprised and indeed shocked at the minor  nature  of the  crimes  
for  which the convicts were transported but  it  must  be remembered that if 
one committed a "major" crime the  sentence was  not transportation but death 
by hanging! 
 
Then  again  objects  can change in value over time.  For  instance  an eighteenth  
century  handkerchief  was often  a  work  of  considerable craftsmanship  and 
artistic endeavour, most unlike the plain  piece  of cloth of today, perhaps 
more akin to our modern iphones in value.
 
There  were only two females  convicted  of  murder  in  this   decade.  But  
even  here,  without the benefit of actually reviewing  the  trial transcripts, 
they may have been for infanticide. (On the other side  of the coin as it were, 
at least one woman was murdered in the colony - by her husband).
 
The  word  prostitution is rarely mentioned in the  description   of  a woman's  
offence however  the pseudonym of  vagrancy   appears  several times.
 
Relanded
During  this  decade  only  one woman on board  the  "Speke"  1808  was recorded 
as being relanded before sailing. She is not identified on the indent,  however 
with only two women having 'no record in  the  colony' found  she  would have 
to be  either Mary Chapman or  Elizabeth  Clarke (the  other  would have to be 
the woman who 'died at sea'  -  again not identified on the indent).
 
Died at Sea
During  this decade a  total  of  30  women  were recorded   as   dying  at   sea.   
This represents  just 2.3% of all  women  transported.  The "Earl  Cornwallis" 
1801 lost eight, the "Experiment" 1804 lost six  and "HMS Glatton" 1803 lost 
five but seven ships recorded none at all.
 
Unfortunately  only  one  woman  has been identified  as  such  on  the  indents, 
Eliza Cooper per "Tellicherry" 1806 and as noted above  either Mary  Chapman  
or Elizabeth Clarke per "Speke" 1808 also died  at  sea. Sarah Kettle per 
"Indispensible" 1809 was the only woman with no record found  in  the colony 
so it has been assumed she was the  one  recorded death  at  sea. Likewise Mary 
Ann Goldsmith per "Canada" 1810  was  the only  woman with no record found in 
the colony so it has  been  assumed she  too  was the one recorded death at sea. 
All the  others  would  be amongst those shown as having 'no record in the colony'.
 
Remarks
During this decade the only information recorded in the Remarks  column was 
whether or not the woman received a Ticket of Leave, Conditional or Absolute 
Pardon (but no dates unfortunately).
 
 
The  sources for this section were the "Convicts  Indents"  micro-fiche held 
in the National Library Canberra. It has to be admitted that it is sometimes 
difficult to read the micro-fiche; for one thing the standard of  photocopying  
leaves  a  little  to  be  desired  and  for  another deciphering  the penmanship 
often presents a challenge, especially  "3" and  "5"  and  "8", as a consequence  
transcription  errors  have  been inevitable.
 
 
Colonial Chronology 
In   this   section  the life of each women once in   the   colony   is tracked   
with  Muster  appearances, Applications  for  Permission   to Marry,   Marriages,  
Births  of  Children,  Certificates  of   Freedom, Conditional   &  Absolute  
Pardons  and  Deaths  being  recorded.   The Chronology mainly focuses on their 
time whilst in servitude.
 
To date only one ship arriving in this decade has been the subject of a 
"biography";  "HMS Coromandel" 1803 but she carried no  female  felons. Otherwise  
all  the women transferred to Van Diemens Land have  a  full biography  in 
"Notorious Strumpets and Dangerous Girls - Convict  Women in Van Diemens Land 
1803 to 1829" by Phillip Tardif.
 
               Table 2. - Colonial Chronology Codes
               ------------------------------------
               AP=Absolute Pardon
               CP=Conditional Pardon
               CF=Certificate of Freedom
               TL=Ticket of Leave
               1801='Musters and Lists New South Wales 1801'
               1805='Musters of Norfolk Island 1805'
               1806='Musters of New South Wales 1806'
               1811='General Musters of New South Wales, Norfolk Island and Van 
Diemens Land 1811'
               1814='General Muster of New South Wales 1814'
               1822='General Muster & Land and Stock Muster of New South Wales 
1822'
               1825='General List of New South Wales 1823, 1824, 1825'
               1828='Census of New South Wales:November 1828'
               1837='General Return of Convicts in New South Wales 1837'               
               c=Birth of a Child
               d=De Facto Relationship
               m=Marriage
               NI=transferred to Norfolk Island
               NSW=returned to New South Wales
               PPD=transferred to Port Phillip District
               PJ=transferred to Port Jackson
               VDL=transferred to Van Diemens Land
               R=left the colony
               CFA=entry in 'Convict Families that Made Australia'
               PR=entry in 'Pioneer Register'
               al=alias
               lw=lives with
               ux=wife of
               []=age
               {}=date of death
               + =year of death
 
 
The 1801 Muster
Only  the three ships arriving in 1801 would have convicts expected  to be  listed 
in this muster but there are surprisingly very few, just  34 or only 15% of those 
in the colony at the time.
 
Why  the two Dowling sisters (per "Atlas I" 1802) should have an  entry in  this  
muster is a mystery, obviously some entries  were  made  well after 1801.
 
The 1802 Muster of Norfolk Island
Of  the  eight women known to have been transferred to  Norfolk  Island none  
appear  to have done so before 1803, meaning that  there  are  no entries for 
this muster for women arriving in this decade.
 
The 1805 Muster of Norfolk Island
Of the 552 convict women arriving in the colony before 1806, only eight are  known  
to have been transferred to Norfolk Island, and  only  one, Elizabeth  Stokes  
per  "HMS Glatton" 1803, has a  known  arrival  date (1803) on the island.
 
The 1806 Muster
Of the 705 convict women arriving in the colony before 1807, 579  (82%) appear  
in this muster, the highest number recorded for any muster  for any decade. 
Regrettably the performance of the colonial bureaucracy  in later  musters sadly 
deteriorated. This is the notorious  muster  where the  Reverend  Samuel  Masters  
(who  conducted  part  of  the  muster) described most of the women as 
"concubines". 
 
The 1811 Muster
All  the women with a fourteen year or Life sentence or arriving  after 1804 
in this decade and still alive would be expected to be included in this muster 
and indeed they were. A commendable 1,032 (81%) are listed, with the later ships 
recording particularly high rates of attendance  - "Canada" 1810 with 94%. This 
muster conveniently records place and date of conviction for the covicts.
 
The 1814 Muster
After  the  stellar performance of the previous two musters,  the  1814 Muster  
is particularly disappointing with only 164 (13%)  appearances, even  the 
"Canada" which arrived in 1810 only had 30% of  her  convicts listed. The reason 
for this low number is uncertain.
 
The 1822 Muster
None  of  the women with seven year sentences would be expected  to  be included 
in this muster as all such women would be 'free by  servitude' and  similarly  
only  those arriving after 1807 with  a  fourteen  year sentence would be expected 
to be included yet a surprising number  were recorded,  34%  in fact (62% of 
those on the 'Atlas'  1802).  Obviously musters were not restricted to serving 
convicts at this time.
 
The 1825 Muster
This  muster  is  somewhat  complicated to  analyse  because  it  is  a combination  
of  musters taken in the years 1823,1824 &  1825  with  no indication  as  to 
which year is being reported. For this  reason  only sporadic appearances are 
recorded.
 
The 1828 Census
All  women  arriving  on  ships before 1829 would  be  expected  to  be included  
and  unlike  the musters, free  people (by  servitude  or  by arrival)  as  well 
as those in servitude are  supposedly  included.  Of course with the passage 
of time, deaths and departures from the  colony would  be  taking  their  toll 
on the  numbers  left  to  be  included, resulting in just 40% being recorded.
 
The ship with the greatest representation, at 65%, was again the "Atlas I" of 
1802.
 
The 1837 Muster
During  this  second  decade only women with life  sentences,  who  had neither  
died nor been pardoned would be expected to be found  in  this muster, and of 
the 177 lifers there were  only six still in  servitude; Mary  Ann  Wilson  per 
"Canada" 1810 (and in goal),  Jane  Arthur  (nee Morris)  per  "Indispensable"  
1809, Maria Bradley  per  "Speke"  1807, Margaret  Rice  per "Tellicherry" 1806 
(in the  lunatic  asylum),  Mary Styles  (nee  Wilson) per "William Pitt" 1806 
and Margaret  Miller  per "Nile"  1801, who had been in continuous servitude 
since  1800,  thirty seven years, was she the longest serving female convict 
in history? .
 
Keep in mind that those whose surnames commencing  with  the letter "K" are  not  
listed  in  contemporary documents of this  muster  for  some reason.
 
 
With  all  the musters and the census the  usual   challenge  presented itself  
when  trying  to  identify particular  women with 29 women  for example  claiming 
to have arrived aboard ships in which their  name  is not  listed  in  the 1828 
Census;  sometimes they  were  listed   under  their   new married name in the 
colony (and sometimes not) as  well  as those who appeared under an alias. 
 
Transfers to Norfolk Island
After  nearly twenty years of settlement, the British  government  made the  
decision  to abandon the settlement on Norfolk Island  due  to  its perilous  
landing sites and isolation. It was decided to resettle  most of  the inhabitants 
of the island in Van Diements Land with  the  first transfers taking place in 
1807 and the last by 1813, although a cleanup party  worked on the island until 
1814 destroying all the  buildings  to make  in  uninhabitable  for  any escapees.  
Just  fourteen  women  were transferred during this decade to the island before 
the closure.  Seven were returned to Port Jackson and the other seven were sent 
to the  new settlements in Van Diemens Land. One woman, Elizabeth Murphy (per  
"HMS Glaton"  1803), was sentenced to the island after it had been  reopened 
as  a place of secondary exile for 're-convicted incorrigibles' in  the 1825.
 
Transfers to Van Diemens Land
During  this  decade the colonization of Van Diemens  Land  began  with numerous  
female felons being transferred to either of the  settlements at  Hobart  Town  
or  Port Dalrymple. A total of  82  women  (6%)  were transferred to the former 
and 16 women (1%) to the latter. 
 
Marriages
The  total  number of marriages conducted whilst  the  woman  was still in  
servitude  (ie  requiring government  permission)  was  867  (68%). Interestingly 
146  (11%) of these took place  within  the  first twelve  months  of  arrival 
in the colony. Some  women have  marriages recorded after emancipation, mainly  
supplied  by descendants.
 
Several  women  had multiple "marriages"; Lucy  Vaughan  (per  "William Pitt"  
1806)  had relationships with five men, marrying four  of  them,  Elizabeth  Crough 
(per "Earl Cornwallis" 1801) also  had  relationships with  five  men,  marrying 
three of them,  Sarah  Robinson  (per  "Earl Cornwallis"  1801)  had relationships 
with four men,  marrying  two  of them,
 
In    the   early   nineteenth  century  spousal   'death'   was    the equivalent  
of  twentieth century 'divorce' which helps to explain many of the multiple 
marriages. 
 
Certificates of Freedom, Conditional & Absolute Pardons
Recording   the  dates  of  Certificate  of  Freedom  is   a   symbolic 'bookending' 
to the womens' life in servitude, starting as it did  with the  date of conviction 
and sentencing recorded on their ships  indents and ending with their 
certification of freedom once more.  Additionally when   no  other mentions  of 
the convict have been found it  indicates she  was  still in the colony at that 
date. Similar  remarks  apply  to Conditional  & Absolute Pardons. Sometimes 
the date of the  certificate is several years beyond the calculated time of 
release, the reasons for the  delay are unclear, perhaps colonial indiscretions 
have been  added to  the  original  sentence.  Finally  it  must  be  noted  that  
these certificates are, for many if not most women, the last colonial  record 
found for them.
 
Deaths
The  dates  of  death of the female felons prove to  one  of  the  more difficult  
genealogical  facts to discover. The    indents   themselves  sometimes  record  
this   information, especially  if  the  woman  died  whilst   still  under  
servitude. Otherwise  they  have been  found  in the  various   colonial   church  
burial   registers  of  the  time  if occurring  before the  year  1840 (the 
last year of personal  extensive research). Beyond   that  year  dates  have  
usually  been  contributed   by descendants and other interested researchers.
 
The  one  exception  to the general paucity of  death  details  is  the "Convict 
Deaths Register : 1828 - 1879" available on microfiche at  the National  Library  
in  Canberra  and  other  locations.  This  register purportedly records all 
convict deaths whilst still under servitude and is  the  source  of the statistics 
under this topic.  For  this  decade around  118  women died whilst in servitude 
being around  9%  of  total arrivals  (nine  women are recorded as dying in their 
first  year).  As always  the percentages change from ship to ship with  "Aeolus"  
1809 recording 16% deaths in servitude but the "Atlas I" 1802 recording only 
4%  and the "Anne" 1801 none. These figures depend on the  thoroughness and  
accuracy  of  the recordings by the colonial  authorities  and  of course  they  
do not take into consideration of deaths  prior  to  1828 which  have been gathered 
from other sources. Combined with the  Deaths at  Sea  numbers  this gives a 
figure of around 12%  for  total  deaths whilst still in servitude. 
 
As  a  point of interest, sadly Mary Stafford (per  "Speke"  1808)  was murdered 
by her husband.
 
An   unexpected  finding  discovered whilst  researching  the   womens' deaths  
was  that  many, if not all, of those who died  at  the  Sydney Hospital  or  
at  the Female Factory in Parramatta where  not  given  a Christian   burial. 
Or if they were, the fact was not recorded  in  any of the existing parish burial 
registers in the colony at  the time!
 
Other Details
These  details  mostly  originate in my previous  works;  "The  Pioneer Register"   
Series   and   "Convict Families   That   Made   Australia" Series,    indicated    
by   the  abbreviations    "PR"    and    "CFA" respectively.
 
Departure from the Colony
The   one  detail  which  is missing and only occasionally appears   to  be  recorded  
anywhere in colonial records is; which and  when   former convicts  returned 
to the UK at the completion of their  sentence,  for the  very  good  reason 
no doubt that they were free  by  then  and  no   longer     under    the   all     
encompassing     colonial     convict bureaucracy. The local folklore is that 
convicts were transported  "for  the    term   of  her  natural  life"  however  
this   is   just    not historically correct. For a start only those convicts 
receiving a  life  sentence   would  be so condemned and even then   an   absolute  
pardon  would  allow  such  a  convict to leave the colony.  It   would  be  so 
interesting to know just how many female convicts did return "home".
 
In  this  decade, 22 women are recorded as having left the  colony  but there  
were no doubt many more. Even the ship of departure is  recorded for four women: 
Maria Tate per "Experiment" 1804 left the colony aboard "Surry"  in 1819 after 
obtaining her absolute pardon;  Honora  Mollowny per  "Tellicherry" 1806 left 
aboard "Harriet" in 1817; Catherine  Miles per "Alexander" 1806 left aboard 
"Midas" in 1824 and Sarah Tillett  per "Canada"  1810 left aboard "Kangaroo" 
in 1817 as soon as  her  sentence expired. 
 
It  is surprising when looking at the chronology of the women  how  many simply  
"disappear"  from any further colonial  records  once  receiving their  
Certificate  of Freedom suggesting they may well  have  left  the colony.
 
Interestingly  four women appear to have retured to the  colony;  Sarah Green  
(per "Nile" 1801) returned in 1818 before transferring  to  Port Dalrymple,  Mary  
Graham (per "Atlas I" 1802) returned in  1817  aboard "Canada", Bridget Denny 
(per "HMS Glatton") having left in 1809 retuned some  time before the 1814 Muster 
and Catherine Miles (per  "Alexander" 1806) returned sometime before the 1828 
Census, although she still gave her ship of arrival as "Alexander".
 
No Record Found in the Colony
Finally, it is surprising to remark that 58 women (4.5%) have no record of  them 
in colonial documents, surprising given that the penal  colony was  in most 
respects highly bureaucratic with all aspects and  details of  a convict's 
existence being meticulously recorded by  the  colonial authorities.
 
 
The   sources for this section were: the books 'Musters and  Lists  New South 
Wales 1801', 'Musters and Lists Norfolk Island 1802', 'Musters of Norfolk  Island  
1805',  'Musters of New South  Wales  1806',  'General Musters  of  New  South  
Wales, Norfolk Island  and  Van  Diemens  Land 1811','General Muster of New South 
Wales 1814', 'General Muster &  Land and  Stock Muster of New South Wales 1822', 
'General List of New  South Wales  1823, 1824, 1825', 'General  Return  of Convicts  
in  New  South Wales - 1837' all published by the  Australian Society of  
Genealogists &  ABGR, the book 'Census of New South Wales:November 1828',  
published by  the  Library of Australian History, the online  database  "Convicts 
Application  to  Marry  - 1825 to 1851" available  on  the  NSW   State Archives  
&  Records website ,  the online database "Convicts Index   -  1791   to  1873"  
available from the same website  and  other  personal research.
 
 
Composite Index
To   facilitate   the   finding and location  of   each   convict,   an alphabetical 
list, ordered by Surname then by Christian name, has  been  created.  Once a 
name has been found, the  index  indicates upon  which ship she arrived and her 
indent number for that ship.
 
The  index has just over thirteen hundred names  (1,362) (more than the documented 
number of arrivals) because 49  names of women are  included  who   were   found 
on colonial records  (such  as  muster  entries,  or applications  to  marry, 
or burial entries etc) and  who  nominated   a  certain   ship  of arrival  but  
who  could  not  be allocated  to  any known  woman to arrive upon said ship.  
This  may have come about as  a result of undocumented aliases or marriages, 
or misunderstanding of how a name was pronounced (there were many regional 
accents in the  colony) or  simple transcription error  or just  a  plain error. 
As an  example Jane   Arthur   nee  Morris  "Indispensible"  1809  was   recorded   
as "Indefatigable" 1812.
 
 
Aliases
To   further   facilitate   the finding of   particular   convicts,   a separate   
list of all known aliases has been  included  totalling  146 in  number. In the 
case of married women it is known that many  of  the "aliases"  were in fact 
their maiden names, but as discussed above   it is  often impossible to tell 
which name was which, however in 32  cases the  maiden  name is known for certain 
and is recorded in  each  ship's chronology.
 
 
Statistics
 
Convict Indent Data
Data collected and analysed from the Convict Indents include:
Statistics
     Code      :Ship Code
     Smee      :Number of Convicts Transported according to C J Smee
     Bateson   :Number of Convicts Transported according to Charles Bateson
     CHL       :Number of Children accompanying their convict mothers
     AG-RG     :Age range of the convicts transported
     D'd-Sea   :Number of Convicts who died at sea and ship percentage of such
     Relanded  :relanded and ship percentage of such
     English   :Number of Convicts who were English and ship percentage of such
     Welsh     :Number of Convicts who were Welsh and ship percentage of such
     Scottish  :Number of Convicts who were Scottish and ship percentage of such
     Irish     :Number of Convicts who were Irish and ship percentage of such
     Other     :Number of Convicts who came from non UK countries and ship percentage of such
     OB-DN     :Number of Convicts who convicted in either London or Dublin and ship percentage of such
     5Years    :Number of Convicts who were sentenced to 5 years transportation and ship percentage of such
     7Years    :Number of Convicts who were sentenced to 7 years transportation and ship percentage of such
     14Years   :Number of Convicts who were sentenced to 14 years transportation and ship percentage of such
     Life      :Number of Convicts who were sentenced to transportation for life and ship percentage of such
 
 
Colonial Chronology Data
Data collected and analysed from the Colonial Chronologies include:
     Ship      :Ship Code
     Lan'd     :Number of Convicts Landed in the Colony according to C J Smee
     Must'1801 :Number of Convicts who were recorded in the 1801 Muster and ship percentage of such
     Must'1805 :Number of Convicts who were recorded in the 1805 Muster and ship percentage of such
     Must'1806 :Number of Convicts who were recorded in the 1806 Muster and ship percentage of such
     Must'1811 :Number of Convicts who were recorded in the 1811 Muster and ship percentage of such
     Must'1814 :Number of Convicts who were recorded in the 1814 Muster and ship percentage of such
     Must'1822 :Number of Convicts who were recorded in the 1822 Muster and ship percentage of such
     Must'1825 :Number of Convicts who were recorded in the 1825 Muster and ship percentage of such
     Cens'1828 :Number of Convicts who were recorded in the 1828 Census and ship percentage of such
     Must'1837 :Number of Convicts who were recorded in the 1837 Muster and ship percentage of such
     NI        :Number of Convicts who were transferred to Norfolk Island and ship percentage of such
     VDL       :Number of Convicts who were transferred to Van Diemens Land and ship percentage of such
     PD        :Number of Convicts who were transferred to Port Dalrymple and ship percentage of such
     M-Year1   :Number of Convicts who were married in their first year of transportation and ship percentage of such
     M-Total   :Number of Convicts who were married and ship percentage of such
     D-Year1   :Number of Convicts who died in their first year of transportation 
     DiS       :Number of Convicts who died whilst still in servitude
     Rt'd      :Number of Convicts who left the colony     
     nrc       :Number of Convicts who have no documents recorded in the colony
     UNK       :Number of Convicts who appeared in colonial records but could not be found on any ship indent


Return to 1801- 1810

Return to Home Page

This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be made to the publisher.